Walking Paris with Henry Miller

Villa Seurat

Henry Miller - Villa SeuratHenry Miller’s first sojourn at 18 Villa Seurat began in the summer of 1931 when he spent a month as the guest of Michael Fraenkel in the ground-floor apartment (to your left). Miller slept on the floor in a corner of the living room, which he later described in The Cosmological Eye:

The room is in a state of complete disorder, as usual. The enormous table is piled with books and manuscripts, with pencilled notes, with letters that should have been answered a month ago. The room gives the impression somehow of a sudden state of arrest, as though the author who inhabited it had died suddenly and by special request nothing had been touched.1

Fraenkel was enthused at having a companion to harangue about his favorite subject: the spiritual death of modern man. This “death theme” which Fraenkel laid out in his book, Werther’s Younger Brother, was a subject of endless discussion that summer and Miller warmed to the debate.

The death theme centered around the idea that modern society, gripped in an economic depression and enthralled by the specter of death manifest in the slaughter of the first world war, was spiritually deceased. Any attempt to mend its wounds by means of political movements or economic adjustment was futile. The task of the artist then was not to struggle to repair society, but to accept its death on a personal level and dispose of the body.

The two men were well matched. Fraenkel saw in Miller a protégé who might live out his philosophy. And Miller found in the death theme a structure that helped order some of his own ideas and which lent a sense of purpose to his earlier failings. If he had failed as a father, husband and business man, then surely he was out of step with modern society and thus well on his way to accepting the spiritual death that would precede his artistic rebirth. “I have no money, no resources, no hopes”, he would write,“I am the happiest man alive.”2

The conversations in the Villa Seurat sparked Miller to begin writing the book that would become Tropic of Cancer. Fraenkel encouraged him to abandon the manuscript he had been laboring over (Crazy Cock) and begin writing the way he talked.3 As Miller wrote to his friend Emil Schnellock, “the process of losing myself began at the Villa Seurat.”4 He refashioned Fraenkel’s death theme for use in Tropic of Cancer, an early draft of which began, “I am living at the Villa Seurat, the guest of Michael Fraenkel. There is not a crumb of dirt anywhere or a chair misplaced. We are all alone here and we are dead.”5 Later, the name of Villa Seurat was changed to “Villa Borghese” and Fraenkel became “Boris”.

Miller’s second stay at this address began three years later when, on the very day that Tropic of Cancer was published—September 1, 1934, he moved into the top-floor studio at 18 Villa Seurat where he remained until May of 1939. The rent was negotiated by Anaïs Nin, who briefly shared the apartment. He reported to Schnellock that “it is a marvelous place—with sun parlor, bath, steam heat, space, etc. and the price has been reduced to 700 francs a month for me, tout compris.”6 And to Fraenkel he announced:

I am singing and I want the neighbors to hear. I am moving in, my neighbors. Moving in to the Villa Seurat. I am the last man alive. They say these are bad times. Perhaps they be. But they are good times for me. I move with the changing climate. I move with the sun and the light. With the birds. With the wildflowers.7

Miller’s gregarious nature soon made the Villa Seurat a hive of artistic activity. Friends and fellow writers dropped in frequently. Alfred Perlès relates that the apartment was host to “cranks, nuts, drunks, writers, artists, bums, Montparnasse derelicts, vagabonds, psychopaths.” The visiting writer Cecily MacKworth recalled:

When the writing moment came, it made no special difference. If there were visitors, they went on playing jazz on the gramophone, reading their poetry aloud to each other or doing whatever they happened to be doing at the time. Henry just moved over into the table in the corner and started to write. Once he began, he went on, apparently never feeling the need to take a walk or go to bed. He wrote on without fuss; pages of Tropic of Capricorn piled up beside him while the red wine in the bottle at his elbow sank lower and lower.8

During this stretch, Miller completed Tropic of Capricorn, Black Spring and Max and the White Phagocytes. Perlès recalled the sense of electricity that Miller’s creativity produced:

Henry Miller radiated from No. 18. Radiated is the correct word. There was a quixotic mood of coercion hanging about the place, like an atmosphere. On approaching, the least sensitive visitor must have become aware of an exceptional presence. Even I who had by now known him for nearly six years, even I couldn’t mount the stairs to his first-floor studio without experiencing a queer feeling of exultation and enthusiasm. I seldom entered without pausing outside the door for a minute or two to take in the familiar Miller noises within. Usually it was the clatter of the typewriter I caught. The door to the sanctum was peppered with notices and avis importants: “If knock you must, knock after 11 A.M.”—”am out for the day, possibly for a fortnight.”—“La maison ne fait pas de crédit”—”Je n’aime pas qu’on m’emmerde quand je travaille.” And so forth.9

Villa Seurat was designed as an artist community in the nineteen-twenties and many famous artists lived on the short street. In addition to Miller, there were at various times: Antonin Artaud, Chaïm Soutine, Salvador Dali, Andre Derain and Chana Orloff. The street is named for the French pointillist painter Georges Seurat.

18 Villa Seurat   Villa Seurat

Location

18 Villa Seurat – See it on Google Maps

Next Stop

Our next stop is on the rue de la Glacière. To get there, return to the entrance of Villa Seurat and turn right onto rue de la Tombe d’Issoire. Then take a right onto the rue d’Alésia and follow it under the railroad tracks. Once past the the Hôpital St. Anne, turn left onto the rue de la Glacière. Keep walking until you cross the boulevard Auguste Blanqui.

Notes

  1. Henry Miller, “Max”, The Cosmological Eye, 25-26
  2. Henry Miller, Tropic of Cancer, 1
  3. Michael Fraenkel, The Genesis of Tropic of Cancer, 25
  4. Henry Miller, Letters to Emil, 116; April 11, 1933
  5. Michael Fraenkel, The Genesis of Tropic of Cancer, 43
  6. Henry Miller, Letters to Emil, 149; May 12, 1934
  7. Michael Fraenkel, The Genesis of Tropic of Cancer, 48-49
  8. Cecily Mackworth, Ends of the World, 5
  9. Alfred Perlès, My Friend Henry Miller, 132

16 Comments so far


jon oropeza

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonoropeza/105091767/

cheers,


Stefan Carapiet

Wonderfully informative about HM. and his doings. But the chronology remains a bit baffling - I suspect Miller of deliberately confusing it. If he stayed the first time at Villa Seurat in ’summer 1931′ (he says October the somethingth), then why does he say about 30 pages later ‘Spring came in like a frozen hare’ . If it was spring ‘31, this reverses the chronology. If it was ‘32,(after he’d been in Dijon) this would make even less sense. I suspect him of deliberately confusing times to add to the sense of chaos and discontinuity of the book.


Kreg Wallace

Stefan,

Trying to match the chronology of events in Tropic of Cancer with the chronology of events in Miller’s real life can be very confusing. The two don’t match up.

Tropic of Cancer is organized according to some kind of seasonal scheme that Miller devised. Many chapters in the book begin with references to a season, such as:

  • “It is now the fall of my second year in Paris”
  • “Easter came in like a frozen hare”
  • “I think it was the fourth of July when they took the chair from under my as again”
  • “It was along the close of summer when Fillmore invited me to come and live with him”
  • “When the cold weather st in the princess disappeared”
  • “It was close to dawn on Chrismas day when we came home from the Rue d’Odessa”
  • “It was spring before I managed to escape from the penitentiary”

Also, the book’s title refers to the highest or most northerly latitude at which the sun rises. The sun reaches the Tropic of Cancer in June, marking the summer solstice.

Events in Miller’s novel are grouped according to the season in which they occurred in real life or by some system Miller has for associating the character of a lived experience with the characteristics of the seasons.

For example, toward the end of the novel, Miller spends the early part of winter living with Fillmore (Richard Osborne) and then he leaves for Dijon where he spends the remainder of the winter. In real life, Miller lived with Osborne during the winter of 1930-31 and was in Dijon during the winter of 1931-32. The events occurred a year apart, but they are grouped together in the novel because they both occurred in the same season.

I think Miller planned to use the motion of the sun through the course of a year as a framework for the events in <em>Tropic of Cancer</em>, much as James Joyce used the journey of Ulysses as the underlying framework for his own novel. The seasonal theme in <em>Tropic of Cancer</em> is hard to trace and may not be complete. Miller may have abandoned the theme before finishing the novel or parts of it may have been discarded in the final editing process.

In any case, Miller shared Fraenkel’s apartment for several weeks in June-July, 1931. He spent much of the fall of that year living with Alfred Perlès in the Hôtel Central. For more information, have a look at “Miller’s First Stay At Villa Seurat, 1931″ from the Cosmodemonic Telegraph Company blog.


Stefan Carapiet (UK)

Hello Kreg,

Thanks for all your info. I can see you’ve really gone into the subject -I’m amazed, How did you find out all those accurate details ?

So the sun reaches the Tropic of Cancer in ‘June’ (a name to conjure with !)

Maybe I can add to the elucidation/confusion. You seem sure that Miller stayed with Osborne in 30-31, but I’m fairly sure, from memory, that both in the Snyder film book and in the 1960’s ‘Miller Reader’ chronology done by himself, he says it was 31-32. Maybe he was lying or forgetful ?

(Also couldn’t it be possible that he stayed with Osborne till about Christmas Day when they ‘came back with two negresses from the phone company’ (lucky bastard), then he went to Dijon in January.

Very possibly you’re right about a grand time-structure behind it all, but it seems to me its quite possible the whole thing is aimed at creating maximum confusion and disorientation of time and place : he pops up here , there and everywhere in the book without any continuity. I’ve just reread it and been struck by its Nietzchean elements : the Dionysiac chaos.

Regards, Stefan Carapiet

(PS I lived in Paris for a year in the 70’s at Porte de Clichy, near to Millers place there.


Kreg Wallace

Well, I don’t have any of the Miller biographies close to hand to check the dates of his stay with Osborn for certain. I do have Letters to Emil here though and it contains two of Miller’s letters, - from December 14, 1930 and February 16, 1931, which have Osborn’s apartment on rue Auguste Bartholdi as the return address. Also, his first mention of his experience in Dijon in those letters is from April 1932. Who knows - certainly Tropic of Cancer follows his real life only loosely and was not intended as straight autobiography. A bit from Tropic of Cancer that seems to hit these themes of a confusion of dates and Dionysian chaos:

It is the twenty-somethingth of October. I no longer keep track of the date. Would you say—my dream of the 14th November last? There are intervals, but they are between dreams, and there is no consciousness of them left. The world around me is dissolving, leaving here and there spots of time. The world is a cancer eating itself away. . . .I am thinking that when the great silence descends upon all and everywhere music will at last triumph. When into the womb of time everything is again withdrawn chaos will be restored and chaos is the score upon which reality is written. You, Tania, are my chaos. It is why I sing. It is not even I, it is the world dying. shedding the skin of time. I am still alive, kicking in your womb, a reality to write upon.


Stefan Carapiet

Hello Kreg. Thanks for that.

Yes, those dates from ‘Letters to Emil’ seem to definitely prove he was there in Osborn’s place in 30-31, I checked it out last night in his self-compiled biog. in the ‘Miller Reader’, and he says it was in 31-32. So he maybe just got confused, or deliberately confused it.

I had another idea for your locations : how about the spot on the Seine near the Porte d’Auteuil and Pont de Sevres (15eme) where Cancer has its great ending?

Since you seem so well-informed on the subject, maybe you could tell me exactly where in Emerson’s writings is to be found the quote Miller puts at the beginning of Cancer about ‘These novels will give way to diaries….’ (I quote from memory). Do you know if it’s from Emerson’s ‘Representative Men’. I’ve always wondered…

The other day I located in London the house, about 20 mins from me, at 27 Letterstone Road, Fulham, London, from where Daphne Fraenkel published ‘Hamlet’ in 1962, and presumably where Michael Fraenkel died in 1957.

(you could add a London section…)

I originally found your site by accident. I was trying to find out where Alfred Perles had lived when he came to live in London in about 1940. I think it was somewhere in north London. Any ideas how I can find out ? It doesn’t seem to be on the Perles biography sites.

Best wishes, Stefan Carapiet


Kreg Wallace

On the Emerson quote, - I seem to remember that question having been answered by James Decker (editor of the Henry Miller Journal) on the old Miller Library bulletin board. Unfortunately, the bulletin board is no longer online, but if I remember correctly, the quote comes from deep in the bowels of a volume of Emerson’s journal. It’s not from one of his better known essays.

I don’t know where Perles lived in London. You might look for a copy of Art and Outrage which is a book of letters between Perles, Miller and Durrell from the 50’s. It’s possible the editor left the return addresses on the published letters - most likely not though.

The spot Miller mentions near Porte d’Auteuil is probably difficult to pinpoint, but if I come across any details there, I’ll be sure to write it up. And thanks for the Fraenkel address. I’ll file that one away for future reference.


Stefan Carapiet

Hello Kreg
By accident, I found out where Perles lived in London - it’s 69 Parliament Hill,Hampstead, London NW3. I bought a signed by Perles copy of ‘Art and Outrage’, dated 1959, and he’d written his address in it !


Kreg Wallace

Hey, that’s quite a find. It’s strange how things work out some times. Thanks for posting the address.


silvia

wow! I’m just a dilettante, but reading this “dialogue” I start to consider giving up dentistry and devoting my self to literature and philosophy! you just keep sharing like this, for me it’s a real treat, and I wanted to express my gratitude. thanks!


murcia

http://www.pierre-murcia.com
I was looking for the Villa Borghèse in Paris, thanks for the answer.


Julia Logan

You write that Anais Nin “initially” paid the rent. You don’t need the adverb there. She paid the rent the whole time he was there. Not to mention feeding him and paying for his dentist, clothing, coats, and eye glasses! He could never have lived there otherwise, it was far too expensive.


Kreg Wallace

Julia,

You’re likely correct that Nin paid Miller’s rent throughout his stay at th Villa Seurat, but I haven’t come across documentation to support that. Miller was bringing in some money from his books during this time and he had other benefactors. In any case, I do think you’re right that Nin’s contributions made up the bulk of Miller’s cashflow during this period.


Sidney Merchant

There is no way that Miller would have allowed sombody to support him like that. He earned his money or borrowed it, he was half starved most of the time. The guy could barely get along but he would not have sucked off the mother teet like that all those years. He was poor and down & out. He never had no money for nothing.


Patrizia

I would suggest you read some diaries Anais Nin wrote while she was with him.She paid his rent, his food, his clothes and books. She also gave him money he usually spent on drinking and women.

He might have been a genius but he was also a parassite with no sense of pride when it came to simply taking and never giving back. He felt entitled.


Stella Maria de Mendonça

Bonne retarde,

Mon nom est Stella Maria et ai un commentaire à faire d’un artiste brésilien à “mère de la modernismo brésilienne” ; Anita Catharina Malfatti, a aussi vécu à on Villa Seurat rue de la Tombe Issoire 101 en 1926 jusqu’au 1928. Peintre brésilien expressioniste classique un artiste plus importants du Brésil. Il a étudié en Allemagne avec Lovis Corinth et a témoigné l’arrivée de l’Art Moderne en 1910 et dans New York a aussi témoigné l’arrivée de l’Art Moderne en 1915 à l’Independent School of Amérique, joint avec les artistes Marcel Duchamp et Juan Gris,Francis Picabia et Léon Nikolayevich Bakst, ils où ont coexisté à l’Académie Independent School of Art et visitaient le philosophe Homer Boss.

À Paris en 1923 s’est rendu un artiste indépendant, près de Matisse, Picasso, André Derain et Foujita. Il a vécu dans une de ces maisons projetées par André Lurçat. En créant dans cet environnement vraies des oeuvres principales.

Je demande pardon par les erreurs dans Français.

Débitrice


Leave a Reply